&l;p&g;&l;img class=&q;dam-image bloomberg size-large wp-image-43259639&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/43259639/960×0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;640&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; President Donald Trump speaking in the Rose Garden at the White House on Friday, Feb. 15, 2019. Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg photo credit: &a;copy; 2019 Bloomberg Finance LP
In two weeks, China will probably be hit with 25% tariffs on $200 billion worth of goods. If not by March 1, then after any trade truce ends, supposedly 60 days later assuming an extension is still on the table.
The market is way too long on the China truce trade. The Dow jumped over 400 points to settle higher for the eighth straight week on Friday.&a;nbsp; President Trump may see the gains as a sign that any pause in tariffs is welcomed on Wall Street and, in theory, cast aside the China hawks in his cabinet led by his Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer.
But consider this: on Friday, Trump spoke about the possibility of a trade deal with China during a Rose Garden press conference. The main point of that presser was to talk about his decision to declare a national emergency at the border and fund his border wall without a congressional vote. What was more interesting to the market was Trump&s;s trade war talk, and saying he wants to include House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer in on a China trade deal.
&q;Any deal I make with China, Schumer&a;rsquo;s going to stand up and say &s;oh it should have been better&s;. That&a;rsquo;s not acceptable to me,&q; Trump said during the press conference. &q;So I&a;rsquo;m thinking about doing something very different…I&a;rsquo;m going to bring Schumer, or at least offer Schumer and Pelosi to come with me and I&a;rsquo;m going to say &a;lsquo;join me on the deal&s;,&q; he said.
&l;img class=&q;dam-image bloomberg size-large wp-image-43256472&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/43256472/960×0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;640&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; Robert Lighthizer, U.S. Trade Representative, as he arrives at a hotel in Beijing on Wednesday, Feb. 13, 2019.&a;nbsp; Lighthizer and his Chinese counterparts signed a memorandum of understanding to continue trade talks. The market took that as a sign that a trade truce extension is likely. Photographer: Qilai Shen/Bloomberg photo credit: &a;copy; 2019 Bloomberg Finance LP
Schumer and Pelosi are Democratic Party hawks on China. Pelosi was critical of China joining the World Trade Organization in the late 1990s. China finally joined in 2001. The only thing Schumer and Trump see eye to eye on is China tariffs.
So either this is going to be a lousy deal and Trump is going to tell the market, look it&s;s not just me — it&s;s all of us. Or this is going to create the bipartisan support needed to keep tariffs locked in on China long after Trump is gone. This seems to be Lighthizer&s;s thinking.
Trump once again praised tariffs on Friday. He said the government was raking in billions of dollars from Chinese tariffs. Imagine doubling those tariffs from the current level of 10% to 25%? Once the government gets addicted to that revenue, what is going to stop them from removing it? Big business? No. They have petitioned the government for weeks now for exemptions, and to no avail.
Wall Street? No. Wall Street will get used to it after they pick the winners and losers an in the stock market and learn where the companies hardest hit are going to get product instead of China. There will be some serious revaluation going on.
&l;strong&g;See: &l;a href=&q;https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2019/01/14/china-is-losing-the-trade-war-in-nearly-every-way/#357a230e7f03&q;&g;China Is Losing The Trade War In Nearly Every Way&l;/a&g; — Forbes&l;/strong&g;
&l;a href=&q;https://blogs-images.forbes.com/kenrapoza/files/2019/02/ASHR-1.png&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;&l;img class=&q;wp-image-57786 size-full&q; src=&q;http://blogs-images.forbes.com/kenrapoza/files/2019/02/ASHR-1.jpg?width=960&q; alt=&q;&q; data-height=&q;530&q; data-width=&q;700&q;&g;&l;/a&g; Does this look like a stock fund that&s;s scared of 25% tariffs? Almost overbought, the Deutsche X-trackers China A-Shares ETF seems to believe one of two things: either the 10% tariffs that were once so terrible are no longer terrible, or investors are doubtful that the Trump Administration doubles tariffs on Chinese imports this year. The only way this pushes higher is if tariffs are removed and/or Xi Jinping over-stimulates his economy.
Worth noting for China investors, higher tariffs do not mean that China necessarily suffers great losses. It can allow the market to lower the value of the yuan to make up for that cost. And Chinese manufacturers, having grown exponentially over the last 20 years, can relocate some of their product lines to other Asian countries. This shift has been taking place even before the first shots in the trade war were fired. Chinese manufacturers have been moving apparel shops to Vietnam and Bangladesh, for instance. Some stitch-and-sew work is being moved into India.
&q;If you get 25% tariffs, the Chinese economy will be under more pressure, but that&s;s a given,&q; says Jin Zhang, a portfolio manager at Vontobel Asset Management. &q;Here in the U.S., companies like GM that have big businesses in China might be in a difficult situation and get beat up by the market. You have to know what you own and try not to own companies that are in the crossfire,&q; he says. &q;We are underweight China.&q;
What else can China do that is of interest to the U.S., while honestly protecting their Made in China 2025 growth strategy, and keeping their core economic policies in place?
There is no great deal in the works, as Trump continually hints is in the bag. If there was great deal, he would not want to share that success with Pelosi and Schumer. Meanwhile, the market is continually told by people close to Trump, including Larry Kudlow, that the gap between both sides remains a big one. How is that closing anytime soon?
China&s;s offer to host Trump in Hainan, a tropical island in south China, was rejected by the White House in favor of a meeting with President Xi Jinping at Mar-a-Lago in Florida. As one investor told me in a casual conversation on Friday: why go to Hainan only to reject China&s;s offer? It&s;s better to bring Xi to the U.S. and say, look, this is what we are going to do.
China may actually be fine with tariffs.
&l;img class=&q;dam-image bloomberg size-large wp-image-43225289&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/43225289/960×0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;640&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; China has toughened its intellectual property laws, but that doesn&s;t seem to be enough for Washington. The last thing Beijing wants is a bunch of U.S. companies suing firms like Huawei, seen here, for alleged infringement of intellectual property.&a;nbsp; How tougher should those laws be? Beijing is not going to make laws that favor foreign companies who believe they have been wronged by their joint venture partners, among other things. Photographer: Qilai Shen/Bloomberg photo credit: &a;copy; 2019 Bloomberg Finance LP
Assuming sizable distance on key items up for debate, namely subsidies by state-owned enterprises to favorite enterprises, especially in the advanced technology space, if China wants to keep those in place they can. In exchange for keeping that status quo, China gets 25% duties.
China has already opened its market to items on Washinton&s;s wishlist, namely financial services. This will probably be expanded over time to payment service firms like Visa and Mastercard, another positive for the American services trade with China.
American financial institutions are currently racing to set up shop in mainland China to tap the investor class there and help professionalize the mainland stock market.
As the MSCI Index continues to increase the weighting of Shanghai and Shenzhen listed stocks in the massive MSCI Emerging Markets benchmark index, U.S. firms will need equity analysts and other fundamental research on the ground to provide market insights to both Chinese and global clients. This is a very important market for American investment firms. Getting this market to open faster than originally planned, without having to partner with a local firm, can be chalked up as a positive for Trump, even though this move was in the works prior to the trade war.
China has also changed its intellectual property laws, allowing U.S. firms to sue. While they may not get a friendly court judge to rule in their favor, the odds of Washington being happy with that given all the theft of IP in the recent past are pretty slim. Companies will have to live with Xi&s;s pledge to toughen IP legal protections for all firms operating in China, and that&s;s that. They will probably be fine with that too, seeing how it is something they never had before. It&s;s a move in the right direction.
We can assume that Xi is not going to make IP laws retroactive, potentially opening the floodgates to American lawsuits against the country&s;s best domestic companies for wrong doings prior to new laws still in the works.
&l;img class=&q;dam-image bloomberg size-large wp-image-43203363&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/43203363/960×0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;640&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; China: not a big fan. Nancy Pelosi failed to get Bill Clinton to see China her way. Trump already does. Chuck Schumer told Trump last year not to let Xi Jinping trick him into a weak trade deal.&a;nbsp; Photographer: Al Drago/Bloomberg photo credit: &a;copy; 2019 Bloomberg Finance LP
Seeing how China is unlikely to change the way its state-owned firms operate to appease the U.S. and assuming they have gone as far as they will on intellectual property, the only thing the U.S. can do is keep tariffs as they are, or tell the Chinese — look, we don&s;t like the role your state firms play in the market and we are not happy with your IP laws so we are going to punish you with a 25% duty. And might even put tariffs on more products as we see fit. The end.
China doesn&s;t have to do anything other than continue talks with the U.S. about market access, in hopes to alleviate the burden of some tariffs on some sectors. But in the meantime, the Communist Party doesn&s;t have a deadline to make Trump happy. For that, the price is 25%. Take it or leave it.
Either the tariffs stay as they are, or they go up. It doesn&s;t take a Harvard MBA and 10 years at Goldman Sachs to figure that out. But tariffs do not come down, especially broadly.&a;nbsp; Over time, sectors or product lines might get a reprieve as trade talks work themselves out.
&q;The return of &s;tariff man&s; and the bizarre invitation to Schumer and Pelosi to share responsibility for the outcome of a Xi summit are suggestive of a President leaning towards 25% tariffs on March 1,&q; says Bryan McCarthy, chief strategist for Macrolens, a boutique investment research firm focusing on China.
The market will sell off the second investors reach the tipping point on this and see more tariffs as the likely outcome.&l;/p&g;